by sportsterpaul » Tue Mar 29, 2016 11:23 am
Oh wow, that is interesting. That thru-hole on the primary chain adjuster boss always bothered me. I tell people do not use silicone there, there is not that much oil that can weep either way down the threads, but I had no idea they used it as an oil return from the primary to the engine. I knew enough to not use too long a bolt on the primary chain adjuster, I wonder if any hacks have pinched the flywheel with a long bolt? I am ashamed to say I have a 1952 engine sitting here I need to start working on, so I should be able to see this very setup. I have never gotten into anything earlier than a 1962.
I guess the other part of this is that the primary had no vent to the outside, in the fill cap, right? So that means the primary would pump down to crankcase average pressure, which I am sure they wanted to be negative.
The original Harley engineers loved to use pulsating crankcase pressure to move oil about. I understand the really early (1920s) engines used positive crankcase pressure to blow oil up to the top end. Taking the whole timed breather out in 1977 and later Sportsters caused a lot of grief. I think it was the late 1990s before they let the Buell guy showed them they needed a huge scavenge pump to keep crankcase pressure negative.
When I was in the auto business, I got schooled about how good negative crankcase pressure is. I asked an engineer about it-- and he tossed me the Parker Hannifin Seal Handbook. It explained that it is nearly impossible to make a seal work across both positive and negative pressure. An O-ring will "pump" from one side of the groove to the other, letting a little oil or fluid by every time. A lip seal is designed for pressure in on direction only. Since I was a young know-it-all, I told him we could used two lip seals, facing each other. He pointed out the Seal Handbook where people have tried that, in hydraulic cylinders. What happens is that the pressure builds up between the two seals, to tens of thousands of PSI, until the seals rupture, or it can damage the piston or cylinder.
That was one of the major botches of the 1977 case redesign. They were on a cost-reduction binge, and figured to get rid of that expensive timed breather. But when they put a check valve in the breather tube, well all that does is let the gearcase and crankcase go from a little above zero as it exhausts to negative as the check valve closes. Its the scavenge pump that tries to keep the pressure negative, and a small pump still lets the crankcase pressure get awful close to zero (gauge-- meaning same as outside air pressure). A little blow-by past the rings, and now the whole engine is going across zero pressure every crank stroke, no wonder they all leak.
Gosh, as I was typing this, JerryR posted, and Dave's, great software shows his post above my preview-- too cool, thanks for those great pictures Jerry, I hope I have all that stuff in my 1952.